This is a topic I have been struggling with over the last year or so. My drawing skills are getting better the more I use them, but does it even compare with what can be done with AI just using the various Photoshop models? Not sure I have totally convinced myself it is worth the time to draw, but it is much more creative when you do it yourself. The Scrawled Cowfish image below (same fish as above but flipped) was drawn from several examples, one of which was my main resource (image on far right on web) and no AI was used to draw the fish image. My top result has a Grok (X) AI Background for a different look (for more on this, see further down).
If you look at the main resource, it could have been AI generated, but the colors and patterning were so interesting it was fun to try to draw. Question is – how can you tell if the resource was AI generated or not? By putting the resource image through AI Image Detector, it said it was 97% fake. TruthScan’s AI Image Detector-Spot Fake & Manipulated also said it was 97% Fake with High Confidence. I cannot verity either of these sites are that accurate, but it does give a sense if an AI effect seems to present. Compare this with my drawing above which got a 98% chance of real in both. Both said my AI background image was 97% real. Guess the AI background was not significant enough to be picked up as AI. And in this case, I may have used AI indirectly to draw my image. This can get complicated it seems. For steps used to create my fish, check end of blog.
Below are several results from using the prompt “Want a drawing of a scrawled cowfish in a dark underwater background” using Photoshop models. I was feeling pretty good about my drawing attempt after seeing the AI results below.
All are examples of PS’s native AI Firefly Image 3 (from October 2024) and the three variations it created using PS2026. The last one showed the same model using PS Beta, where my drawn image was used as a Reference Image by pressing the icon on the Contextural Task Bar to load it (also tried in PS 2026 and was just as bad – had to remove the badly written nonsense text on shown image and on all variations as it also ran off the documents). Only 1 credit was needed in PS2026 and PS Beta. Definitely not the greatest results but I will say the Beta version actually looked kind of cool.

Also in PS2026 was the Flux Pro 2 model (uses 20 generative credits) as in top left image, Firefly Image 5 (released in April 2026 and used 10 credits but only get one variation) as shown top middle, Gemini 3 with Nano Banana Pro (this is Google and cost 40 credits per generation) as shown in bottom left, and the far right is Gemini 3.1 with Nano Banana2 (this is Google and in PS2026 it cost 20 generative credits for 1K or 2K resolution outputs, and 30 credits if larger). I actually liked the top left Flux image’s background – looked really nice. Gemini 3.1 with Nano Banana2 (this is Google) also had a nice background but the light beams were a bit much for a deep water fish.

This last AI group were created using software outside of Photoshop – just thought it might be interesting to see what they would create with the same prompt. All the created images below were free to download. The top image used Grok (X). The bottom left image was created by Google Gemini (another free AI image program that uses Gemini 3.1 Flash image or Nano Banana 2) – note it is very similar to PS’s Gemini 3.1 with Nana Banana2 but more colorful (see above for PS credits needed if created in PS). The bottom right image was made by Chat GPT. These were a little uncomfortable for me considering all the effort it took to draw my original image. It does appears that these AI programs found my main resource image to create their cowfish images. Interesting!

Below are some of the backgrounds created using PS, Grok, Google Gemini Nano Banana2, and Chat GP – just so you can see what kind of results occurred. Here is the basic prompt used for all of the images: Create a deep ocean darkish blue background with only sandy bottom and possible sunken ship or rocks on bottom. Wanted to use PS so started with Firefly Model 3 and overall it was not bad. The first three variations were of big fish swimming around so I had to change the prompt to the one above. (Apparently I mentioned fish in the prompt for the first iteration.) Tried to work with Variation 1 (the others were not too good), but had trouble removing the sunrays, adjusting the icy looking rocks, and the boat appeared to be too new (top right image below). Decided not worth using a bunch of credits to fix up in AI or spending time to correct all of this.
By using the following AI programs, no credits were wasted in PS. The Grok (X) initial image decided I didn’t really what a ship and left it out so the prompt was adjusted to get the correct image (right below). Then I had to get it to remove some sunrays and move the boat further right so I had room for the fish (the one I used in top image above). Google Gemini Nano Banana2 had rocks in the foreground that looked funny and a bright highlight behind the boat so another image was rendered without these – liked the result but too realistic to go with a drawn image (left middle image). Chat GPT had a great image but the boat was too big and too dark and had weird lighting on the ocean floor – tried again and still too dark with weird lighting (bottom left image).

So this is my dilemma – should I do something because it is fun, or should I try to do something else and keep up with all the new-fangled things coming out with AI? It personally is much more rewarding to do it myself – just trying to keep the AI urges under control but still using them. I kind of like the idea of letting AI just create the backgrounds, like the top image, which are hard to draw and can be quite time-consuming. This gives you more time to explore the creative process. The AI background image is more pleasing to me I think, but the fish is not as realistic looking. And I do want to keep in mind how much cheaper it can be to use some of the free AI products as PS AI does require credits to use it. Don’t know how most people feel, but the credits and/or monthly charges I do not like. Figure I have not resolved my issue yet, but working on it. For now, just keeping an eye open to see what the next big AI breakthrough will be. Have a good week!….. Digital Lady Syd
How the top image was created:
Used Aaron Blaise’s basic technique – did a blog on this a while back called Doing the Daily Drawing with Aaron Blaise – some great tips in his videos. Started with a 16″ X 9″ document Size at 300 dpi. A rough drawing was made using several resources – had to decide on a basic configuration of the fish so used this one Scrawled Cowfish . Also used a basic image of all the parts of this type of fish to understand how the fins are placed in the image. Lowered the opacity of the rough drawing and added new layer to make a Refined drawing layer for use as a guideline of the fish. I use Aaron Blaise’s Erodible Tip brushes from years ago, but any brush can work. Painted the body a solid light blue color. Used Obsidian Dawn’s SS Painted Flowers-flowercenter 03 (got on DeviantArt a long time ago-she sells these brushes now). This brush was just a basic brush with 25% spacing. To make it useful, added Shape Dynamics Size Jitter of 40%, Angle Jitter of 56%, Roundness Jitter of 51% and checked Flip X Jitter; Transfer 11% Opacity Jitter and Control set to Pen Pressure; and Smoothing on (default set to 10% even if field is blank in the Options Bar). The Size was adjusted for what I was painting and I painted almost everything on the fish body with this brush. Turned on Texture section when needed using a texture by Yaz (really rough black and white effect), Scale of 6%, Brightness 48, Contrast 30, checked Texture Each Tip, Mode Multiply, and Depth 69%. This gave the fish the interesting texture in parts of it. To create the flower effect a Pattern Stamp by Jessica Johnson was used called Bubbly 6 from an Advent Calendar she gave out for the holidays in 2021 and used a glitter pattern. (It may be in her Jungle set.) Fins were tricky and used Pelleron‘s Sunray brush 2 for Pectoral Fin and tail fins and brush 5 for the dorsal fin – then added a layer mask to shape the fin. I tried lots of different effects, and this one seems to be the best. Unfortunately none of these brushes are free, but they can still be found. Just wanted to give an example above of how to be creative with the brushes to get different effects. Rarely do the original brush settings have what is needed to get the effect desired. The other steps were using Aaron Blaise’s recommended Highlighting and Shadowing brushes as shown in almost all of his videos. This step really makes the drawing pop and gives a more interesting look.
































